7/27/2023 0 Comments Peerguardian downloades![]() ![]() That's the sort of interaction one would expect. When a 'trough' hit the ftp the http used the now available bandwidth and its speed rose for a while. They ran together for a few minutes sharing the available bandwidth 50% each. You will notice when an ftp download was initiated it only hit half speed and it dropped the http download to half speed. If my ISP were interested in choking my downloads why/how would he single out the utorrent protocol (whatever that is) ? But, of course, he denies any such interest. I can and do achieve that speed anytime with http downloads. That's what I posted the graph for - to show that full speed is attainable and is attained and is maintained. ![]() There is no one minute of full speed on the utorrent graph. There is no one hour of full speed on the utorrent graph. The one hour of full speed was with an http download (downloading ubuntu from their site). My ISP () swears they do nothing beyond limit me to my 'plan' - 512kbs up/128kbs down. slow peer." ?Ĭan someone explain this to me a little more fully? So I'll be in a position to find out if this is what happens and will be able to modify things to overcome it? My peers can choke traffic to me, can they? And they would do that if they perceived me to be a ". I would really like to know what it means: ".get nearly instantly choked by nearly every peer on those torrents." At the time of the posted graph there was only one. 'multiple torrents at once." Sometimes I have two. My graph indicates there's certainly none for http. Well, he swears there's none, so that's that. "choking logic" I assume refers to the method of choking my traffic employed by my ISP. Utorrent's graph, posted earlier, shows a max speed of only half that and with PERIODIC deep troughs. You can see it is running at close to 500kb/s for extended periods, only having minor troughs. Here's an image of prtg's log of a download by http. ![]() My total download per month or my available speed per second. I don't come near using my available bandwidth, whichever way you interpret that much distorted (I think) expression: i.e. Thanks for the reassurance about utorrent being the best. anyway, I play with it and try to improve things. Doesn't seem to fit the utorrent thing with it's 'xx'. ![]() I'm expecting something that mimics my upload/download figures from my ISP. I use the xx/128k things but I must admit they puzzle me. you sure get some postings in any one day, don't you? I hope you're all still watching the thread. You can see the speed never gets over 24kB and the grid there is a one-hour grid so you can see clearly the pattern of four 'troughs' every hour.ĭoes anyone have any ideas? Up to and including directions to a 'better' program than utorrent if there is one out there? Here's a graph from utorrent showing its most recent behaviour: It strikes me as very strange this period four-times-every-hour behaviour and so does the speed limit. I've done all this other testing with prtg, downloading ftp and http and it seems to be confined to utorrent downloads. I can download http, such as downloading ubuntu from their site directly through the browser, and I'll get nearly 50kB/s no problem, for at least an hour, I've seen that.Īnother serious problem is that my downloading has periodic 'troughs' down to almost nothing, regular as clockwork, four times an hour. My max download being about 50kB/s, therefore.īut I never seem to get more than 30kB/s and am much more commonly limited - and the peaks seem to be cut off, it seems to be a real limitation - to about 23kB/s. My downloads seem to be limited to half my available speed - which isn't much anyway. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |